The DeSantis Dilemma
Although the most recent polls are not great for Trump, there is little reason to think he will decide not to run and very few, if any, people inside of the Republican Party can stop him.
This page contains links to recent blogs by Lincoln Mitchell
Posted in: US Politics
Although the most recent polls are not great for Trump, there is little reason to think he will decide not to run and very few, if any, people inside of the Republican Party can stop him.
The best way for the US to help Ukraine is to have a functioning Biden administration-and preventing that is the primary goal of the GOP. Therefore, doing the domestic and policy work must be at the center of Biden’s efforts to support Ukraine in this war.
Biden’s challenge is to maintain the consensus view of Putin and Ukraine by continuing to show the American people the horrors of what is occurring in Ukraine and why it is imperative that the US do something about it. The latter is more difficult than the former, but if Biden cannot do that, then the transformation of his presidency will be brief and the return to stalled policy proposals and low approval ratings will be swift.
It is true that sometimes presidents have to place good policy over short term political gain; and the war in Ukraine is certainly one of those times when that calculation might be necessary, but Biden could do more to reduce some of the possible political harm of these policies.
A Ukraine reeling from invasion and possibly occupation would be weak, unstable and have no chance of further integration into NATO and the EU. That may be Putin’s goal, but it may not be all he is trying to do. And, Ukraine is not the only country that could end up weaker and less stable due to this war.
Justice Stephen Breyer’s announcement that he is stepping down from the Supreme Court after serving on the highest court in the land for almost 28 years has naturally set off a spate of speculation about who President Biden will pick as his replacement. During the campaign Joe Biden pledged that if elected he would appoint the first African American woman to the court. All signs indicate that Biden intents to honor that pledge and several African American women’s names have been mentioned as possible candidates.
We cannot know for certain who Biden will choose, but we know that the President must get his nominee confirmed. This is looking likely because even Democratic senators like Kyrsten Sinema from Arizona and Joe Manchin from West Virginia, who have opposed important parts of Biden’s legislative agenda, have supported Biden’s previous nominees to federal courts. Anything can happen, but there is a good chance the caucus will stay together and confirm whoever is nominated. Although there would be 6-3 conservative majority on the court, replacing Breyer with a younger liberal justice who will bring a new perspective to the court is good news for the Democrats.
If that nominee is confirmed she will not be the first federal judge appointed by Biden and confirmed by the senate. In fact, thus far just over a year into his presidency, Biden has already had 42 of his nominees confirmed. That is the most any president has confirmed in his first year in office since 1981. It is also a piece of political information that while very important for Americans is not widely known, even among progressive voter who should care a lot about this.
The fault for this does not lie with the voters, but with the Biden administration. It reveals the inability of the White House to effectively communicate its accomplishments. The first year of the Biden presidency has been far from perfect. Two new variants of Covid, inflation, the poorly managed withdrawal from Afghanistan and the inability to pass Biden’s Build Back Better bill have not only marred his first year in office, but they have become part of a group of negative stories that have defined the Biden presidency-and the Biden administration has let that happen.
This is unfortunate for the President because it doesn't take much scrutiny to see that has accomplished quite a bit. The massive Covid relief bill, the infrastructure bill, the early success in getting vaccines out despite a Republican supported anti-vaccine movement and the number of federal judges appointed and confirmed are among President Biden’s most significant accomplishments. Even the withdrawal from Afghanistan, which is now remembered primarily for the difficulty and horrific optics around evacuating people from the country, was a case of Biden implementing a popular policy that previous presidents had promised and not delivered.
Biden’s poor poll numbers over the last several months, which if unchanged will probably lead to a big Republican win the midterm elections, are due in large part to the battery of economic, political and public health problems that the country continues to face. However, these numbers also reflect Biden not getting credit for his accomplishments-and while the media environment is very tough, getting credit for the things you do right is something all presidents, and other chief executives, must be able to do.
The failure of the Biden administration in this area has taken two forms. First, they have simply not made sufficient effort to draw attention to and take credit for their accomplishments. The Covid relief checks went out earlier this year to little fanfare from the White House. Similarly, the infrastructure bill, which was by any measure an enormous accomplishment that will help communities around the country has receded from the public consciousness and become something that seems to be mentioned only Washington insiders.
The second misstep the Biden administration made was to allow expectations to be extremely elevated during the early months of Biden’s presidency. In those halcyon days it was not altogether uncommon to find articles and commentary suggesting that Biden was going to be the new Franklin D. Roosevelt and remake American social policy. There are only a handful of American politicians to whom no president should ever allow himself to be compared. Abraham Lincoln is one and FDR is another. If the bar for a successful Biden presidency was the New Deal, then he was always going to be seen as a failure, but for some inexplicable reason, Biden allowed that framework to emerge.
As the midterm election approaches, the Democrats are in danger of having an election that is about their failure to end the pandemic, combat inflation and deliver a massive spending bill, but it is not too late to make the election about the Democrats success in vaccinations, infrastructure, Covid relief, and for the base of the party, judicial appointments. A successful Supreme Court confirmation might just be place for the messaging around Biden to change, but it won’t happen unless the White House takes the lead on that.
Photo: cc/Amaury Laprote
Given Russia’s role in destabilizing American politics in recent years, it is certain the Kremlin understands the President, and the country’s, vulnerability at this moment. That may not be the primary reason they have chosen now to loudly beat the drums of war in Ukraine, but it has certainly informed their thinking.
The biggest challenge is to persuade a significant proportion of those who now support the authoritarian movement that is almost entirely indistinguishable from the Republican Party that democracy is a better solution. If the GOP is recaptured by conservatives who believe, generally, in the idea of democracy, or if it is defeated enough that fewer than about 30% of the American people support it, democracy will have a chance in the US. However, if neither of those unlikely events come to pass, the crisis will endure for a while.
January 6th will mark one year since the violent insurrection at the US Capitol that sought to disrupt the certification of President Biden’s victory in the 2020 election. While that is a significant anniversary that we should recognize and reflect upon, it should not be overlooked that 2022 is the sixth year in a row that has begun with American democracy in crisis.
We have treated the Constitution as a sacred text for so long that if we shatter that conceit, we are left with very little guidance for how to form a functioning, cohesive and democratic state, so we continue to accept the Constitution even as its democratic deficits directly immiserate so many of us. That is the American conundrum as we head into 2022. Happy New Year.
The American media has been covering politics as a horserace, giving equal times and credence to both sides, for so long that it is very hard to change. However, the overarching story in the US now is the threat to democracy posed by the GOP. Ignoring that in favor of false equivalencies and continuing to treat both sides as roughly equal is not just lazy and bad for democracy, but, by overlooking the true nature and goals of the Republican Party, is also deeply partisan.
The vision that Moscone and Milk shared, and that was groundbreaking at the time, of a city whose government was as diverse as its people, where discrimination for any reason-including sexual orientation-was outlawed, where neighborhoods have a bigger say in what happens in the city and, yes, where police power is reined in, ultimately became the ideas that formed the core of progressive urban governance everywhere in the US.
Trump’s Covid policy, and recent revelations about how he endangered the life of Joe Biden are not just stories that demonstrate his erratic behavior and tenuous grip on reality, but a reminder of the danger Donald Trump represents in so many different ways and that even though the disgraced former president has always been a big buffoonish, we must continue to take him very seriously.
Ultimately, the recent Virginia elections tells us much less than we would like to think about what will happen in the 2022 or 2024 US elections, but they provide a roadmap for both parties. Much of what happens in those elections will depend on how well the parties can follow those roadmaps.
There are never any guarantees in politics. Sinema and Manchin could decide to sabotage any major spending bill. The Delta variant could regain strength, or a more deadly and infectious new variant could emerge. Despite those possibilities, there is a clear path forward for Joe Biden’s presidency and a clear roadmap for improving his fortunes that are now lower than at any point during his relatively young presidency.
The upshot of all of this is that Georgian democracy is stuck in neutral; more accurately it is stuck in a slow reverse. But, there is another loser in this election as well, the foreign powers, specifically the EU and the US who bought into the political crisis narrative several months ago and forced a strange deal onto the government and then did nothing when the government broke the deal.
One of the most radical, and rarely discussed, ways that September 11th changed the US is that since that day many Americans have begun to think of ourselves as victims. It is true we were attacked that day and the people who died in those attacks or because of their efforts to help on that day were indeed victims. However, the shared sense of national victimhood was a paradigm shift that went well beyond those individuals and their families who were genuinely victims.
Many Americans live in a flawed but largely functioning democracy that has a weaker social support system than many affluent countries, but still has a commitment to some equality and government services, but other Americans live in right-wing states that are the policy love-child of Ayn Rand and Jerry Falwell and whose leadership continues to participate in the Trump death cult.
The foreign policy establishment is overwhelmingly supportive of an expansive role in the world. This is in some cases due to strongly held ideas, in rare cases due to overt greed or nefarious intentions, but in most cases due to something much more banal-bureaucratic logic.
Asking Republicans who feign earnest concern about America’s national security, or more ironically how the rest of the world sees us, about January 6th and the Trump administration more generally is not partisanship, it is, in fact, balanced journalism. However, almost nobody in the media did this.